检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]安徽大学教务处,安徽合肥230601 [2]安徽大学商学院,安徽合肥230601
出 处:《安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2013年第2期20-26,共7页Journal of Anhui Agricultural University:SOC.SCI.
基 金:安徽省政府重大课题(皖政研2012-5:<加快安徽旅游经济大发展研究>);安徽省哲学社会科学规划项目(AHSK09-10D25:<基于产业转移的安徽省旅游业转型升级对策研究>)
摘 要:通过选取高等级旅游资源构建旅游资源指标体系,利用安徽省统计年鉴、统计公报以及政府网站的数据,基于绝对数量、人均拥有量和地均拥有量3个评价指标,运用位序得分法对安徽省16个地市旅游资源竞争力进行比较研究。结果表明:各地市各类旅游资源竞争力水平等级差异较大,其中黄山、宣城等皖南地区各城市旅游资源竞争力较强,宿州、阜阳等皖北地区城市旅游资源竞争力较弱。并在此基础之上,针对旅游资源分布不平衡的现状提出了各地市旅游业发展的相应对策。On the basis of related theories of tourism competitiveness, this paper establishes evaluation index system of tourism resources competitiveness. And then with the data from Anhui statistical yearbook and social statistical bulletins and governmental websites, it made a quantitative analysis comparing tourism resources among 16 cities in Anhui province, by three kinds of evaluation indexes (absolute amount, per capita density, per area density) and a sequence scoring method. The result shows that the competitive level of three kinds of tourism resources in every city varies markedly; the competitiveness of three kinds of tourism resources is much stronger in Huangshan and Xuancheng; however, Suzhou and Fuyang are relatively weak. To other cities, they all have relative advantages in particular resources. The distribution of tourism resources is different, which makes related enterprises and governments pay more attention to the competitive tourism resources. It helps display comparative advantages, further stimulating the development of tourism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30