检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张颖[1]
出 处:《武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2013年第2期306-312,共7页Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
基 金:广州市人文社会科学重点研究基地资助项目(09B09)
摘 要:从清末到民国,近代化淘汰了旧政权框架下的变革措施,国人逐渐认识到中国已经不由自主地卷入了宪政革命潮流。然而自清末立宪到民国各届政府的制宪,主动地变革宪法也迟迟不能完成宪政革命。反观中国近代制宪,在三次重要变革的关口都发生了向虚假宪法变革的转变,这种转变产生了"假宪法"现象,这无异于宪政革命的自戕。近代化以"假宪法"的方式推进,直接导致了宪政革命陷入无法完成的境地。After consistently failed reforms under traditional political framework, it was gradually realized that flows of modernization had crushed down the old regime. However,constitution-making carried by Republic of China also failed to show great improvement than that in Qing Dynasty. It seemed a hopeless way for China to accomplish its destiny as a constitutional revolution. To review this frus- trating history in China's constitutionalization process,there would be found three impalpable distractions having led the nation to a different direction to constitutionalization, which made constitutionmaking merely illusive.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.94