是捍卫还是背离?——论亨利希·库诺夫对马克思唯物史观的解读与运用  

Defense or deviation?——On Heinrich Cunnow’s understanding and practice of Marxist historical materialism

作　　者：郑如[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学马克思主义社会理论研究中心,江苏南京210093

出　　处：《中南大学学报（社会科学版）》2013年第2期73-78,共6页Journal of Central South University：Social Sciences

摘　　要：亨利希·库诺夫是第二国际时期重要的思想理论家,他在马克思主义发展史中占据着争议性地位,但却往往被忽视。他对马克思唯物史观的理解有其独到之处,并且将其原创性地运用于人类学领域,在19世纪末20世纪初他的研究成果对马克思主义理论的传播和发展做出了一定贡献。他在理论和实践中的倍受批判与其对马克思唯物史观的理解有着密不可分的关系。与公认的经济决定论者拉法格相比,他更加彻底地以"捍卫"的立场"背离"了马克思的唯物史观,将其理解为经济史观,并以此为基点考察资本主义的阶段特点,得出了与马克思截然不同的结论。在当下中国的视阈中审视并研究库诺夫的思想,对于中国的社会建设将大有裨益。Cunow is one of the most important theorists in the period of the Second International, who occupies a controversial position in the development history of Marxism. However, he is always neglected. He had his own unique understanding of Marxist historical materialism, and made application in the area of anthropology originally. He also devoted himself to developing and spreading of Marxism. There is a close relationship between criticism on him and his understanding of Marxist historical materialism. Comparing with Lafargue, who was recognized as an economic determinist, he seemed to defend Marxist historical materialism, but he deviated it essentially. In his view, it was economic materialism. Based on it, he made study on capitalism and came to very different conclusions from Marx. It will be greatly benefit for the construction of Chinese society to examine Cunow＇s ideas in contemporary China.

关 键 词：亨利希·库诺夫 第二国际 唯物史观 经济史观 马克思主义 

分 类 号：B03[哲学宗教—哲学理论]