基于AHP-TOPSIS评判模型的姑山驻留矿采矿方法优选  

Mining method optimization of Gu Mountain stay ore based on AHP-TOPSIS evaluation model

作　　者：王新民[1] 秦健春[1,2] 张钦礼[1] 陈五九 陈宪龙 

机构地区：[1]中南大学资源与安全工程学院,湖南长沙410083 [2]柳州华锡有色设计研究院有限责任公司,广西柳州545005 [3]马钢集团姑山矿业公司,安徽当涂243100

出　　处：《中南大学学报（自然科学版）》2013年第3期1131-1137,共7页Journal of Central South University:Science and Technology

基　　金：科技部"十一五"科技支撑计划项目(2008BAB32B03)

摘　　要：为了解决马钢集团姑山露天铁矿境界外驻留矿体的开采技术难题,在综合层次分析法(AHP)和逼近理想解的排序法(TOPSIS)基本理论的基础上,建立AHP-TOPSIS综合评判指标体系模型,对4种拟选的采矿方法进行综合评判优选。从经济、技术、安全3方面综合考虑影响采矿方法的评判指标,通过层次分析法客观的确定各评判指标的权重向量,进而结合逼近理想解的排序法原理构建AHP-TOPSIS综合评判指标体系模型,计算出4种采矿方法基于评判指标的综合优越度。研究结果表明:4种拟选采矿方法的优越度分别为45.3%,46%,64.3%,30%,第Ⅲ种采矿方法(上向水平分层充填法)最优。该结果与模糊数学、突变级数法的评判结果基本相符,AHP-TOPSIS综合评判指标体系模型对于采矿方法优选具有工程的可行性和有效性。In order to solve the mining technical problem of outside boundary stay ore for Gu mountain open pit iron ore of Masteel Group,an AHP-TOPSIS comprehensive evaluation index system model was established based on the basic theory of analytic hierarchy process（AHP）and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution（TOPSIS）, and the AHP-TOPSIS comprehensive evaluation index system model was used to evaluate four kinds of mining methods comprehensively.Considering the economy,technology and security,which impacted the evaluation indexes of mining method,the weight matrix of the evaluation indexes was established according to the AHP method,and then,the AHP-TOPSIS comprehensive evaluation model was established with the basic theory of TOPSIS.Finally,the superior degrees of mining method based on the comprehensive evaluation index were calculated.The results show that the synthetic superior degrees of the optional mining methods are 45.3%,46%,64.3%,30%,and the third method is the optimal.The research results are consistent with that of fuzzy mathematics and catastrophe progressing method,and the AHP-TOPSIS comprehensive evaluation model for mining method optimization has the feasibility and effectiveness.

关 键 词：采矿方法 评判指标 层次分析法 逼近理想解的排序法 综合评判模型 

分 类 号：TD853[矿业工程—金属矿开采]