检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]重庆市长寿区第三人民医院放射科,长寿401221 [2]重庆市长寿区人民医院放射科,长寿401220
出 处:《重庆医科大学学报》2013年第3期319-321,共3页Journal of Chongqing Medical University
摘 要:目的:探讨CT图像计分与格拉斯哥评分(Glasgow coma scale,GCS)及临床预后之间的关系。方法:129例颅脑损伤病人行头颅CT连续扫描,根据CT显示颅内结构改变计分,分为轻型(≤5分),中型(6~10分)和重型(≥11分)。结合GCS及临床转归进行临床对照分析。结果:2种评分之间比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.44,P=0.80),CT图像计分各型之间的预后差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.69,P=0.03)。结论:CT图像计分与GCS评分在颅脑损伤病情分级存在相关性,能较好评估颅脑损伤的预后,为临床判断预后提供重要的客观依据。Objective:To explore the relationship between Glasgow coma scale(GCS) and CT image score in predicting clinical results and prognosis of craniocerebral injury. Methods:Consecutive cranial CT scan was carried out in 129 patients with cranioeerebral injury. All patients were divided into three groups according to CT image scores:mild injury( ≤5 points),moderate injury ( 6-10 points ) and severe injury( ≥ 11 points). CT image scores were compared with GCS scores and clinical prognosis. Results:Differences between the two kinds of scores were not statistically significant(X2=0.44,P=0.80). All types of craniocerebral injury according to CT image scores were statistically related with clinical prognosis (X2=4.69,P=0.03). Conclusions:Correlation between CT image scores and GCS scores in craniocerebral injury classification exists,which provides an important objective method to evaluate the clinical prognosis of craniocerebral injury.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.12.162.40