对调解书的检察监督:角色、范围及实现  

Procuratorial Supervision to the Mediation Conducted by Courts: Role, Scope and Measures

作　　者：张剑文[1] 李清伟 

机构地区：[1]国家检察官学院,北京102206 [2]宁夏回族自治区固原市人民检察院,宁夏固原756000

出　　处：《时代法学》2013年第2期48-56,共9页Presentday Law Science

基　　金：2012-2013年度国家检察官学院科研基金项目资助课题研究成果之一

摘　　要：检察机关对调解书进行监督的权限已为新修订的民事诉讼法确认,须关注的是如何使此项制度发挥实际效用,实现对调解书的有效监督。民事调解检察监督是对问题调解案件的救济渠道之一,也是启动审判监督程序的途径之一,是对虚假诉讼恶意调解案件的最重要监督手段。从民诉法条文解释和实践层面的共识来看,检察监督无法也不应限定于特定类型的案件。对于调解监督实践面临的包括主动发现案件、审查案件时间延长、检察建议效力缺乏刚性、案件量增加的挑战等难题,应采取建立通报机制、民事检察一体化办案、区分抗诉与检察建议适用案件类型、优化考核机制等措施予以应对。The power of procuratorial supervision to the mediation conducted by the courts has been provided by newly amended civil procedure law, therefore, further discussion should focus on actual effect of this procuratorial supervision. As one of the remedies for faulty mediation cases and one of the approaches to the procedure of adjudication supervision, the procuratorial supervision to the mediation is the most efficient measure against mendacious litigation leading to malicious mediation. The scope of the procuratorial supervision to the mediation cannot and should not be confined to specific cases on the basis of both interpretation of relevant articles of the civil procedure law and consensus in practice amongst the judicial organs. However, several difficulties facing the procuratorial organs still need to cope with such as the discovery of cases, prolonged examining period, lack of effectiveness of the procuratorial advice, and the increase of cases.

关 键 词：恶意调解 调解自动履行率 社会公共利益 检察建议 

分 类 号：D916[政治法律—法学]