欧盟执行DSB裁决实践立场及策略研究  

Research on EU's Position and Strategy in the Implementation of DSB Rulings

作　　者：左安磊[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学研究生院,上海200042 [2]新加坡国立大学法学院,新加坡259776

出　　处：《时代法学》2013年第2期104-118,共15页Presentday Law Science

基　　金：商务部调研课题"WTO争端解决机构裁决执行问题研究";2012年上海地方高校大文科"研究生学术新人"项目;华东政法大学研究生创新能力培养专项资金资助项目(编号20112004)阶段性成果

摘　　要：欧盟内部执行DSB裁决的具体法律制度和实践行为是WTO法研究中重要而又被长期忽视的问题,亟需国际法之考察。纵览欧盟参与WTO争端解决机制的活跃性,细究欧盟被诉案件执行现状,可以总结欧盟执行DSB裁决的三大类型(执行、拖延、不执行)以及欧盟基本执行立场和态度。欧盟对DS397案(中国诉欧盟紧固件反倾销措施案)的裁决执行也反映了欧盟执行的虚实并存。中国应学习借鉴欧盟执行DSB裁决的法律技巧。Analysis of EU＇s internal legal system and practices for the implementation of DSB rulings is a long-neglected problem in WTO law, which is in urgent need of international law review. With an overview of the EU＇s active participation in the WTO dispute settlement mechanism and indepth study on the implementation status quo of the 17 categories European Union cases as ent, it can be summed up that the EU implement DSB respond rulings in three types （implementation, delay and non-performance） and that the EU has its own basic implementation position and attitude. By analyzing EU modification of EU anti-dumping Council Regulation in accordance with DS397 ruling, evaluation of the implementation of EU sees coexistence of good and wrong. China＇s process of legal skills learning from WTO members and the European Union to implement DSB rulings is still a long way to go.

关 键 词：欧盟 DSB裁决 执行实践 立场及策略 

分 类 号：D996[政治法律—经济法学]