裁判客观性与转型中国法治的契合  

On the Agreement of Judgment Objectivity with the Transition of China's Rule of Law

作　　者：孙日华[1] 胡育仁 

机构地区：[1]石家庄经济学院法学院,河北石家庄050031 [2]浙江省奉化市人民检察院,浙江奉化315500

出　　处：《开封大学学报》2013年第1期9-14,共6页Journal of Kaifeng University

基　　金：2012年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目<社会转型期裁判客观性问题研究>(12YJC820092)的阶段性成果;2012年度中国法学会部级法学研究课题<行政法解释的理论基础与适用方法研究>[CLS(2012)D247]的阶段性成果

摘　　要：维护裁判客观性是站在司法的克制立场上说的,这与转型中国的法治具有相当程度的默契。维护裁判的客观性,就是在微观层面巩固法治;捍卫裁判客观性,不仅是在维护法治的形式价值,更是在体现法治的实体价值。裁判客观性是自治型法治的题中之义,形式主义理性建构起来的法治就需要司法裁判的客观性来维持。在形式法治还没有充分发展的条件下,超前追求实质法治,可能带来法治的倒退。在转型中国语境之下,裁判客观性具有巨大的法治意义。Maintaining judgment objectivity in judicial restraint position has quite a tacit agreement with the transition of China＇s rule of law. Safeguarding the judgment objectivity is to consolidate the rule of law at the micro level. That is not only upholding the rule of law in the form of value, but also embodying the entity value of rule of law. The judgment objectivity Lives in autonomous rule of law, and the rule of law built on the rational formalism needs judgment objectivity to maintain. Under the context of China in transition, the judgment objectivity is of great significance in the rule of law.

关 键 词：裁判客观性 转型中国 法治 

分 类 号：D926[政治法律—法学]