检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]清华大学公共管理学院
出 处:《中国行政管理》2013年第5期41-46,共6页Chinese Public Administration
摘 要:近年来中国公共政策形成过程受到各方高度关注。相关研究文献也很多。本文在系统梳理国内外解释政府决策理论的基础上,将其分为三种视角,分别是"利益权力视角"、"理性学习视角"和"理念视角"。这三种竞争性视角都为观察政府决策提供了具有洞察力的理论透镜。文章进一步考察了它们在中国研究中的应用,发现前两种视角已经普遍被吸收到解释中国政府决策的研究中,而相比之下基于理念视角的分析则少之又少。这也使得政治文化、意识形态、政策理念等对决策产生深刻影响的因素并没有得到足够的重视。同时,政治权威作为意识形态等理念的操控者,其在决策过程中的显著作用也没有得到足够的阐释。The public policy making process of China has been highly concerned by all parties during recent years. There are also a large number of related research literatures. Based on a systematicliterature review, this paper classifies current theories into three perspectives: power--interest, rational learning and ideas. These three competitive perspectives all provide insightful theoretical lenses for the observation of government decision--making process. The paper further examines the application of these perspectives in China study. Based on the examination, we find that the former two perspectives have been widely usedfor the study of China's government decision--making process; by contrast, empirical studies based on the idea perspective are rare. As a result, some ideational factors that do shape the formation of public decisions, such as political culture, ideology, and policy ideas, have not received enough attention. Besides, as the controllers of some special types of ideas, such as ideology, the significant roles played by political authorities are not well illustrated.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13