检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴飞飞[1]
出 处:《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2013年第2期133-138,145,共7页Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
基 金:2012年国家社科基金青年项目资助"慈善捐赠人权利研究"(12CFX027)
摘 要:传统意义上的公司自治主要关注公司与股东、公司与国家之间的冲突与协调关系。公司社会责任这种社会利益代言机制的兴起,衍生出了公司自治的第三种维度——公司相对于社会的自治。公司社会责任之具体化法律条款,若落实于公司法中,则会以泛道德渗透的形式多重限制公司之自治空间,而侵损商业社会之根基。将公司社会责任之具体化法律条款剥离于公司法之外,在保障公司自治的前提之下,以外在约束而非内在制衡,实现公司所应承担的社会价值关怀,是公司社会责任法律进化的应然性选择。Traditional sense of company autonomy mainly involves the conflict and coordination between the company and shareholders as well as the conflict and coordination between the company and the state. The company's social responsibilities as the representative of social interests give rise to the third dimension of company autonomy, in contrast with social autonomy. The specific legal terms of corporate social responsibilities, if realized in company laws, with their broad moral repercussions, will limit the autonomous space of the company and damage the foundations of the commercial society. These specific legal terms should be stripped in company laws. With the premise of securing the autonomy of company, they should act as external constraints instead of internal regulations in order to realize the company's social responsibilities.
分 类 号:D922.291.91[政治法律—经济法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70