检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]长沙理工大学文法学院,湖南长沙410076 [2]湖南大学金融与统计学院,湖南长沙410079
出 处:《经济数学》2013年第1期54-59,共6页Journal of Quantitative Economics
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目(12AJL007);湖南省社会科学基金项目(11YBA006);湖南省自科基金项目(批准号S2011J50431510)
摘 要:选取了1995年至2007年我国29个省市面板数据,建立以城市化水平为被解释变量,能源消费和碳排放作为解释变量的模型,通过协方差分析检验和Haus man检验的分析结果,确定研究模型的形式为固定影响变截距模型,最后,通过对拟合模型的结果分析,实证结果表明:高能耗、高排放、粗放式经济发展方式不利于城市化水平的提高;同时,各省市的城市化发展水平也存在差异.因此,各省市应在城市化工业化进程中推进产业结构和能源消费结构调整使其朝着更有利于节能环保的方向演进,节能减排政策的调整重点应该放在能源强度和能源消费碳强度上.This paper selected 29 provincial panel data from 1995 to 2007, and found both energy consumption and carbon emission were the Granger causes of urbanization level by the use of Granger causality test. Then this paper set up a model, whose variables are energy consumption, carbon emission and urbanization level. By means of covariance analysis test and the results of Hausman Test, we have determined the form of research model is the model of fixed-effects and variational intercept. Finally, through the results analysis of fitting models, we have got the conclusions as follows: high energy consumption, high exhaustion and extensive economic growth are bad for the improvement of urbanization level. Meanwhile, there are differences between the urbanization level of each province as well. Therefore, in order to make it go forward on the way of energy conservation and environmental protection, each province should adjust industrial structure and energy consumption structure. Moreover, the key point of policy adjustment of energy conservation and environmental protection should be put on the intension of energy and the carbon intension of energy consumption.
分 类 号:F062.2[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200