检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张文生[1]
出 处:《台湾研究集刊》2013年第2期1-7,共7页Taiwan Research Journal
基 金:国家社科基金重点项目"构建台湾海峡两岸关系和平发展框架研究"(11AZZ005);教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"国家尚未统一特殊情况下的两岸政治关系研究"(12JJD810011);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(Supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities)"增进两岸政治互信研究"(2010221078)
摘 要:本文试图从宏观的角度对两岸和平协议的性质作出分析。两岸和平协议本质上是国内两个政治实体之间的协议,而不是国与国之间的条约。两岸和平协议不是两岸统一协议,但不能排除两岸统一的政治指向。两岸和平协议是在国家尚未统一的特殊情况下的政治安排。两岸和平协议是两岸关系和平发展的框架协议,是两岸关系和平发展的制度化。The paper tries to make a detailed analysis of the Cross-Strait peaceful agreement from a macroscopic perspective. The peaceful agreement is essentially an agreement between two domestic political entities rather than a treaty between the countries. On the other hand, the agreement is not a Cross-Strait unification agreement, however, it can not rule out the political point of the unification. It can be taken as a political arrangement under the special condition that the country is not yet reunified. In fact,the peaceful agreement is considered not only a framework agreement but also an institutionalization of peaceful development across the Taiwan Straits.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15