供受体性别匹配对活体肾移植预后的影响  

Effect of gender matching on the outcomes of living-donor renal transplantation

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:周静怡[1] 黄洪锋[1] 吕军好[1] 陈江华[1] 

机构地区:[1]浙江大学医学院附属第一医院肾脏病中心浙江省肾脏病防治技术研究重点实验室国家中医药管理局三级实验室“肾脏病免疫实验室”,杭州310003

出  处:《中华肾脏病杂志》2013年第4期243-247,共5页Chinese Journal of Nephrology

摘  要:目的探讨供受体性别匹配对活体肾移植预后的影响。方法通过回顾性分析本院419例活体肾移植的临床资料,评估男性供体男性受体组(MDMR组)、女性供体女性受体(FDFR组)、女性供体男性受体(FDMR)组、男性供体女性受体(MDFR)组的急性排斥、肾功能和存活率的差异。结果术后6个月,MDFR组和FDFR组Scr[(80.7±17.9)、(87.4±21.9)μmol/L比(120.3±72.5)μmol/L,均P〈0.05]、尿酸(UA)[(318.1±86.4)、(303.1±66.9)μmol/L比(358.4±77.8)μmol/L,均P〈0.05]显著低于MDMR组,差异均有统计学意义。FDMR组Scr[(117.7±27.4)μmol/L比(80.7±17.9)Izmol/L,P〈0.011、UA[(371.0±92.4)μmol/L比(318.1±86.4)μmol/L,P〈0.05]显著高于MDFR组。且肾小球滤过率(GFR)较低[(70.4±17.8)ml/min比(79.6±18.9)ml/min,P〈0.05]。FDFR组Scr[(87.4±21.9)μmol/L比(117.7±27.4)μmol/L,P〈0.01]、uA[(303.5±66.9)μmol/L比(371.0±92.4)Izmol/L,P〈0.01]显著低于FDMR组。术后1年,FDFR组GFR低于MDFR组[(72.4±25.3)ml/min比(82.7±18.7)ml/min,P〈0.05]。术后2年,FDFR组uA低于MDMR组[(322.9±69.7)μmol/L比(376.0±66.2)μmol/L,P〈0.05]。术后3年,FDFR组Scr[(88.7±27.0)μmol/L比(112.7±27.8)μmol/L,P〈0.05]、UA[(318.3±61.2)μmol/L比(396.2±100.3)μmol/L,P〈0.05]仍低于FDMR组。术后5年,各组间Scr、uA和GFR的差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。MDMR、MDFR组、FDMR组、FDFR组移植物缓慢恢复功能、急性排斥率、术后1年移植肾和患者存活率的差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。结论移植物缓慢恢复功能、急性排斥、短期患者和移植物存活率与性别匹配无关。女性供体男性受体肾功能差于其他供受体性别配对。无论何种Objective To evaluate the effect of gender matching on the outcomes of living- donor renal transplantation. Methods A total of 419 cases of living-donor renal transplantation in our center were divided into male - donor- male - recipient (MDMR) group, male - donor- female- recipient (MDFR) group, female - donor - male - recipient (FDMR) group, female - donor- female - recipient (FDFR) group. The outcomes including graft and patient survival, acute rejection and renal function were analyzed retrospectively. Results Compared to MDMR group, MDFR group and FDFR group had lower Scr [(80.7±17.9), (87.4±21.9) μmol/L vs (120.3±72.5) μmol/L, all P 〈 0.05 and uric acid (UA) [(318.1 ±86.4), (303.5±66.9) μmol/L vs (358.4±77.8) μmol/L, P〈 0.05 6 months after operation.Compared to MDFR group, FDMR group had higher Ser[(117.7±27.4) μmol/L vs (80.7± 17.9) μmol/L, P 〈 0.011, UA [(371.0±92.4) Ixmol/L vs (318.1±86.4) μmol/L, P 〈 0.05 and lower glomerular filtration rate (GFR) [(70.4± 17.8) ml/min vs (79.6± 18.9) ml/min, P 〈 0.05. Compared to FDMR group, FDFR group had lower Scr [(87.4±21.9) μmol/L vs (117.7±27.4) μmol/L, P 〈 0.01 and UA [(303.5±66.9) μmol/L vs (371.0±92.4) μmol/L, P〈 0.01. Compared to MDFR group, FDFR group showed lower GFR [(72.4±25.3) ml/min vs (82.7±18.7) ml/min, P 〈 0.05 1 year after operation. Compared to MDMR group, FDFR group showed lower UA [(322.9±69.7) μmol/L vs (376.0±66.2) μmol/L, P 〈 0.05 2 years after operation. Compared to FDMR group, FDFR group showed lower Scr [(88.7 ± 27.0) μmol/L vs (112.7±27.8) μmol/L, P 〈 0.05 and UA [(318.3±61.2) μmol/L vs (396.2± 100.3) μmol/L, P 〈 0.05 3 years after operation. 5 years after operation, there were no significant differences in above indexes, the incidence of slow graft function, acute rejection and survival of graft and patient among groups. Conclusions Male recipients of female d

关 键 词:肾移植 活体供者 移植物排斥 性别匹配 

分 类 号:R699.2[医药卫生—泌尿科学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象