现代中国文学的自我认同  

The Self-identification of Contemporary Chinese Literature

作　　者：王乾坤[1] 王书婷[1] 

机构地区：[1]华中科技大学中文系,湖北武汉430074

出　　处：《华中师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2013年第2期87-93,共7页Journal of Central China Normal University:Humanities and Social Sciences

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(华中科技大学2012自主创新基金)"中国现代文学的‘合法性’研究"

摘　　要：上世纪八十年代黄子平等人提出的"20世纪中国文学"概念及其引起的学术链,是相关学界一次自觉的自我认同思潮。吴炫以"文学性"为标识的本体论"穿越"是其中最有深度的环节,"个体性"是其立论基石。谭桂林等人的质疑富有启示地指出了它可能引起的思维混乱和绝对化模式。本文在梳理这一思潮的同时,审理了其中的核心概念。本体论上的"独一"没错,但"独一"并非"独尊"。"文学性穿越"只能是一种文学的应然指向,而不可归于某一种模式。In 1980s ward by some scho search. Besides, it the concept of ＂the 20th Century Chinese Literature lars, such as Huang Ziping, which triggered a initiated a trend of selfidentifica ontology ＂traversing＂ characterized by ＂literariness＂ tion in related , generated its chain of academic was put for academic re circles. The greatest profundity a mong them, which was suggested by Wu Xuan. Meanwhile, ＂individuality＂ laid a solid foundation in its theoretical inference. Although the suspicion from scholars such as Tan Guilin didn＇t hit the nail on the head, it pointed out the thinking disorder and absolute thinking mode which was probably caused by the language and provided important en lightened significance simultaneously stresse from ＂dom literature, misunderst ination＂. T On this d on the herefore, basis, this essay ＂uniqueness＂ of ＂literary traversin discussed some nuclear concepts, and ontology, which was totally different g＂ was one kind of necessary targets of or it was a process of selfidentification so as to constantly avoid mistakes and andings rather than a single model.

关 键 词：现代中国文学 自我认同 文学性 个体性 文学史模式 

分 类 号：I206.7[文学—中国文学]