检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:魏然[1]
机构地区:[1]四川省绵阳市西南科技大学法学院应用心理学教研室,四川绵阳621010
出 处:《现代预防医学》2013年第9期1703-1705,1709,共4页Modern Preventive Medicine
基 金:四川省教育厅人文社科基地;四川省犯罪防控研究中心课题资助(FZFK10-05)
摘 要:目的调查社区服刑人员的社会支持与心理健康状况的相关关系。方法采用症状自评量表(SCL-90)、与社会支持评定量表(SSRS)对四川省绵阳市涪城区司法局所辖的10多个街道、乡(镇)的社区矫正试点单位中社区服刑人员共78人进行了调查。结果 (1)男性样本的社会支持状况显著低于常模(t总分=-4.552,P﹤0.001;t客观=-3.228,P﹤0.01;t主观=-3.079,P﹤0.01;t利用度=-3.873,P﹤0.01),女性样本则仅在总分上显著较低(t=-3.033,P﹤0.05),男性在总分(t=-1.957,P﹤0.05)和支持利用度(t=-1.903,P﹤0.05)两个维度上显著低于女性。(2)社区服刑人员与普通人在SCL-90总均分上差异仍有统计学意义(t=2.914,P﹤0.05),而因子均值显著高于常模的依次是强迫(t=2.284,P﹤0.05)、人际关系(t=1.579,P﹤0.05)、抑郁(t=-2.086,P﹤0.05)、躯体化(t=2.399,P﹤0.05)、焦虑(t=2.142,P﹤0.05)、精神病性(t=2.147,P﹤0.05)。(3)社区服刑人员在总分和主观支持维度方面与SCL-90的大多数维度呈显著的负相关,且主观支持是唯一进入多元逐步回归方程并有显著意义的因素(β=0.179,t=2.264,α=0.05)。结论社区服刑人员的社会支持与心理健康状况都与普通人有差异,且这二者有显著联系。OBJECTIVE To survey the relationship of social supports and mental health status of community inmates.METHODS 78 community inmates in more than 10 pilot precincts for community correction dominated by judicial administrations in Fucheng District in Mianyang City of Sichuan province of China were measured by the Symptom Checklist(SCL-90)and Social Support Rating Scale(SSRS).RESULTS(1)The male sample’s SSRS scores were significantly lower than norm in all dimensions(ttotal =-4.552,P﹤0.001;tobjective =-3.228,P﹤0.01;tsubjective =-3.079,P﹤0.01;tuse =-3.873,P﹤0.01),while female sample did so only in total score(t =-3.033,P﹤0.05).Otherwise,the scores of males were remarkably lower than ones of females in the dimension of total score(t =-1.957,P﹤0.05)and use of support(t =-1.903,P﹤0.05).(2)It was revealed by SCL-90 that there were significant differences between the sample and norm in General Symptomatic Index(t = 2.914,P﹤0.05).And the factors which means were remarkably higher than norm were in turn obsessive-compulsive(t = 2.284,P﹤0.05),interpersonal sensitivity(t = 1.579,P﹤0.05),depression(t =-2.086,P﹤0.05),somatization(t = 2.399,P﹤0.05),anxiety(t = 2.142,P﹤0.05)and psychoticism(t = 2.147,P﹤0.05).(3)There was a significant negative relevance between most factors of SCL-90 and the dimension of total score and subjective support of SSRS,and the factor of subjective support was the only one with significance which entered the equation by multiple stepwise regression(β = 0.179,t = 2.264,α = 0.05).CONCLUSION There are differences between community inmates and the average in social support and mental health status,which are remarkably associated with each other.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200