检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国病案》2013年第4期59-60,共2页Chinese Medical Record
摘 要:目的探讨多方位过程监控对铜绿假单胞菌医院感染的影响。方法筛选呼吸内科两病区铜绿假单胞菌感染患者作为监控组和对照组,监控组由科室专业管理小组对监控涉及人员和过程进行多频次现场监控与干预,与对照组进行对比研究。结果监控组和对照组患者继发感染发病率存在统计学差异(χ2=8.89,P<0.01),同时病区医院感染发生率也存在统计学差异(χ2=4.25,P<0.05),具有统计学意义。结论多方位过程监控比结果评价更能有效地控制交叉感染,降低医院感染发生率,提高医疗质量。Objective To investigate the impact of the multi-faceted process monitoring to nosocomial infection caused by pseu- domonas aeruginosa. Methods Select pseudomonas aeruginosa infection patients from two respiratory medicine wards as the monitoring group and control group, the monitoring group was given multi-frequency-site monitoring and intervention to the personnel involved as well as the process by the department professional management team. Results The secondary infection incidence of the monitoring group and the control group patients are of statistical differences (X2 = 8.89, P 〈 0.01), and the two wards' nosocomial infection rate are also have statistical significance (X2 = 4.25, P 〈 0.05). Conclusion The multi-faceted process monitoring is more effective than the outcome evaluation in controlling cross-infection, which can reduce the nosocomial infection rate and improve the quality of medical care.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3