检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周成泓[1]
出 处:《佛山科学技术学院学报(社会科学版)》2013年第2期44-49,共6页Journal of Foshan University(Social Science Edition)
基 金:教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(10YJC820175);教育部人文社会科学一般项目(12YJA840008)
摘 要:就医疗侵权责任的因果关系,患方存在举证困难,但《侵权责任法》对此未有明文,将发展具体举证规则的任务留给了司法。两大法系对医疗侵权责任因果关系虽实行一般的证明责任分配规则,但通过司法创制了诸多减轻乃至倒置证明责任的方法。我国应当采行动态证明责任观,自诉讼的全过程来观察和解决患方的举证难,目前可以使用的重要工具是事案解明义务,并可引进疫学证明方法。There are difficulties for the patients to prove causality of medical negligence liability, howev- er, there are not any provisions for it in Tort Liability Act, and the task of developing evidence rules has been left to the judicial. The two law systems adopt general rule of allocation of burden of proof, but it creates many methods of mitigating or inverting proof burden through judicial. The dynamic burden of proof should be adopted by China to resolve difficulties of the patients from all courses of the proceed- ings. Currently, the obligations of cases solution could be an important tool for this, and causality of immunology can also be introduced.
关 键 词:医疗侵权责任诉讼 因果关系的证明责任分配 动态的证明责任
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.173