中国针灸对非洲下腰痛患者的疗效观察  

Research about Acupuncture Efficacy on Africans with Low Back Pain

作　　者：张善纲[1] 王晓红[1] 熊楚梅[1] 

机构地区：[1]广州军区武汉总医院,湖北武汉430070

出　　处：《中华中医药学刊》2013年第5期1188-1190,共3页Chinese Archives of Traditional Chinese Medicine

摘　　要：目的:探讨中国针灸对非洲下腰痛患者的疗效。方法:随机将下腰痛患者分为针灸治疗组和常规治疗组,前者给予针灸加红外线治疗,后者给予药物治疗加西式按摩等常规治疗,以日本骨科协会(JOA)腰椎评分对治疗前后的腰椎功能进行评分和比较。结果:治疗前两组在JOA总分和亚类上无统计学差异,治疗后针灸组JOA计分增加10.8±1.6,常规治疗组增加7.9±1.8,两者有显著差异(P<0.01)。除在临床检查的子项外,在自觉症状、日常活动能力针灸组均优于常规治疗组(P<0.01)。针灸组JOA的改善率为(77.0±20.1)%,而常规治疗组的改善率为(60.3±33.6)%,两者比较具有统计学差异(t=2.52,P=0.014)。结论:针灸对非洲患者下腰痛的疗效优于常规治疗。Objective：To explore the efficacy of acupuncture on Africans with low back pain.Methods：Patients with low back pain were divided into the acupuncture treatment group and the conventional therapy group randomly.The former was given the acupuncture plus infrared therapy,while the latter given the conventional drug treatment and massage therapy.Japanese Orthopedic Association（JOA）score of lumbar was used as an assessment to evaluate and compare the function before and after treatment.Results：There were no significant difference in the JOA score and the sub-categories between the two groups before treatment.After treatment,the JOA scores in the acupuncture group and conventional group increased by 10.8±1.6 and 7.9±1.8,which demonstrated the significant differences by P0.01.Except the clinical examination,the sub-categories of the symptoms,activities of daily living and the efficacy of acupuncture group were superior to those of the conventional therapy group（P0.01）.The development of JOA score was（77.0±20.1）% in acupuncture group,which was higher than that of the conventional group at（60.3±33.6）%（t=2.52,P=0.014）.Conclusion：The efficacy of acupuncture was better than the conventional treatment in Africans with low back pain.

关 键 词：下腰痛 针灸 非洲 

分 类 号：R245[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]