检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]承德石油高等专科学校,承德067000 [2]中国电力企业联合会,北京100055
出 处:《动力工程学报》2013年第5期381-386,共6页Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering
摘 要:为了验证火力发电机组耦合空气透平系统降低厂用电率的可行性,制定了萨拉齐电厂300MW循环流化床锅炉机组耦合空气透平系统的3个试验方案,其中方案1、方案3不需要改造锅炉空气预热器,而方案2则需要改造锅炉空气预热器.对试验所用设备性能参数及价格进行调研,并对试验方案的热流分布进行了计算和对比.结果表明:在综合考虑3个试验方案的节能效果、试验成本以及对机组正常运行所可能带来的影响后,确定方案3为最佳方案,其与方案1相比,由于排烟温度较低,所以节能效果较好,与方案2相比,由于不改动空气预热器,所以对锅炉部分的改动较小,试验的风险较小.To reduce the service power rate of thermal power unit via coupling air turbine system, 3 test schemes were proposed for Salaqi 300 MW circulating fluidized bed (CFB) boiler unit, among which schemes 1 and 3 don^t need to retrofit the air heater, but scheme 2 does. Based on the survey to perform- ance parameters and price of relevant test facilities, the calculation of heat flux distribution in each scheme was carried out and a comparison was made among the schemes. Results show that by comprehensively considering the energy-saving effect, test cost and impact on normal operation of the unit, scheme 3 is re- garded as the best option among all the 3 schemes, of which the energy-saving effect is better than scheme 1 due to its lower exhaust gas temperature, and its test risk is lower than scheme 2 since it is not necessary to retrofit the air heater.
分 类 号:TM611[电气工程—电力系统及自动化]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28