检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄志瑾[1]
机构地区:[1]上海对外贸易学院国际经贸研究所,上海200336
出 处:《国际商务研究》2013年第3期54-63,共10页International Business Research
摘 要:自2011年美国副国务卿提出竞争中立概念后,美国及以其为首的TPP、OECD都将竞争中立规则的制定作为重要的议题推出。本文对竞争中立概念的起源、规则的内涵、在TPP谈判中的地位以及在OECD语境下的涵义进行了梳理。在分析了竞争中立规则的国际造法过程后,本文对中国政府在国际投资法的新一轮国际造法中的立场以及对竞争中立具体问题的对策做出若干分析。中国政府应当尽早参与谈判,掌握话语权和规则制定权,对国际投资法领域的新一轮国际规则制定占据主导和主动的地位。The U.S. formulated the Competitive Neutrality as an import issue since 2011 after the Deputy Secretary of State made a statement of it. TPP and OECD followed the U.S. approach and made sophisticated study on the rule of Competitive Neutrality. This paper focuses on the origin and the meaning of the conception, tries to make clear how important this issue is and how the Chinese government should do facing this issue. This paper also suggests that the Chinese government take two steps. First, the Chinese government should be involved in negotiations as soon and as deeply possible. Second, the Chinese government should take itself as a key-role member of the international law-making community.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222