湖殇:明末以来清源东湖的存废与时运——兼与汾阳文湖之比较  

The Preservation or Removal of East Lake in Qingyuan County and Its Fate since the End of Ming Dynasty: In Comparision with Wen Lake in Fenyang County

作　　者：张俊峰[1] 张瑜[1] 

机构地区：[1]山西大学中国社会史研究中心,山西太原030006

出　　处：《山西大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2013年第3期80-86,共7页Journal of Shanxi University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

基　　金：山西省人文社科重点研究基地项目(2010309);山西省青年学术带头人项目(1005728)

摘　　要：清源东湖形成于明末,时人一度视其为清源大害必欲废除,迭经争论,最终保湖舆论占据上风始得以保留。汾阳文湖则命运多舛,自宋金以来经过三次大规模泄湖为田事件,终致湖泊消失,旱涝灾害随之而来。同为湖泊,不同命运,历史时期人们对待湖水资源的不同认知水平和态度,对于湖泊景观和区域生态环境的变化具有重要影响,必须高度重视,引以为戒。East Lake formed at the end of Ming dynasty. At that time, people regarded it as a disaster and tried to take measures to remove it. After debating many times, the public voice of preserving lake prevailed, hence the East Lake was kept. On the contrary, the Wen Lake in Fenyang County wasn＇ t so lucky. Having been drained of water for three times since Song and Jin dynasty, it eventually disappeared, and subsequently all kinds of disaster came one after another. Although they were both lake, but they did have different fate. Therefore the different attitude and dif- ferent cognitive level will greatly influence the change of lake pay great attention to them and learn a lesson from them. scenery and regional eco - environment. People should pay great attention to them and learn a lesson from them.

关 键 词：泄湖 保湖 东湖 文湖 存废 

分 类 号：K928.4[历史地理—人文地理学]