证明力规则的效力分析——《关于办理死刑案件审查判断证据若干问题的规定》文本的解读  

Analysis on the Effect of Proof Regulations——An Interpretation of Regulations of Reviewing Evidence for Death Penalty Cases

作　　者：徐阳[1] 张溶开[1] 张宛初[2] 

机构地区：[1]辽宁大学法学院,辽宁沈阳110136 [2]辽宁大学文学院,辽宁沈阳110136

出　　处：《东北大学学报（社会科学版）》2013年第3期294-298,共5页Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)

基　　金：辽宁省教育厅优秀人才资助项目(WJQ2012004);国家社会科学基金资助项目(09BFX064)

摘　　要：《关于办理死刑案件审查判断证据若干问题的规定》中存在中国式的证明力规则。然而,与英美法系的证据规则相比,我国的证据证明力规则效力,具有弱规范性、非规范性和非授权性的特点。对于中国证明力规则诸多教科书式的文本表达,规则制定者有必要在"立法"技术上反思:将大量经验性规则作为司法解释条款"法律化",难免有重回法定制度时代之嫌。还应注意,证明力规则的排除条款的刚性弱化,使这一证据规则警示功能降低,有悖于设立初衷。There are a great number of Chinese proof regulations in Regulations of Reviewing Evidence for Death Penalty Cases; however, compared to the evidence rules in the Anglo-American legal system, the Chinese proof regulations are characterized by weak normalization, non- normalization and non-authorization. It is essential that the rule makers should reflect on the textbook-style expressions of Chinese proof regulations in terms of legislative techniques. With the judicial experience taken as law provisions, the time of inquisitorial procedure seems to revive. In addition, the weakening of exclusion provisions might degrade the warning function, which goes against the regulators＇ original intentions.

关 键 词：证明力规则 排除条款 死刑案件 

分 类 号：D631[政治法律—政治学]