检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李锘[1] 赵文斌[1] 张广中[2] 张云璧[3] 刘瓦利 李元文[5] 史飞[6] 刘建平[7] 邢建民[7] 白彦萍[1]
机构地区:[1]中日友好医院皮肤科,北京100029 [2]首都医科大学北京中医医院皮肤科 [3]北京中医药大学东直门医院皮肤科 [4]广安门医院皮肤科 [5]北京中医药大学东方医院皮肤科 [6]空军总医院皮肤科 [7]北京中医药大学循证医学中心
出 处:《北京中医药大学学报(中医临床版)》2013年第2期23-26,共4页Journal of Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基 金:"十一五"国家科技支撑计划项目(No.2008BAI53B044)
摘 要:目的建立中医药外用治疗血热型银屑病的规范化疗效评价方法。方法通过回顾性研究、文献整理、专家问卷、优化论证形成初步的疗效评价方法,以普连膏治疗血热型银屑病为范例,按照循证医学要求设计并进行多中心、大样本、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的临床试验,对疗效评价方法进行验证、总结,根据临床研究结果对银屑病皮损面积和严重程度指数(PASI)评分及中医证候评分进行调整和改良。结果初步建立了包括疾病疗效评价、中医证候疗效评价和安全性评价的中医药外用治疗血热型银屑病的疗效评价体系。结论本研究提出的疗效评价方法能够全面、准确、客观地评价中医药外用治疗血热型银屑病的临床疗效,值得临床推广、应用。Objective To establish a method for standardized evaluation on curative effect of external Chinese medicinal for treating psoriasis of blood-heat type. Methods Through retrospective study, literature arrangement, expert questionnaire and Optimization argument, an evaluation method was formed initially. The multi-centered, big sampled and randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled clinical trials were designed according to demand of evidence-based medicine, taken Pulian Gao treating psoriasis of blood-heat type as an example, for verifying and summing up the evaluation method. The scores of psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) and TCM syndromes were regulated and improved. Results An evaluation system of curative effect was initially established including evaluation of curative effect on disease, evaluation of curative effect on TCM syndromes and evaluation on safety. Conclusion The evaluation method established in this study is comprehensive, accurate and objective in the evaluation on the curative effect of external Chinese medicinal for treating psoriasis of blood-heat type.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30