检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张吉新[1] 李士华[1] 张颖[1] 毕宝林[1] 崔兆伟[1]
出 处:《中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志》2013年第4期303-305,共3页China Journal of Emergency Resuscitation and Disaster Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨院外急救车上心肺复苏(CPR)建立人工气道通气的最佳方法和对复苏成功率的影响。方法对院外急救车上发生心跳呼吸骤停患者318例,根据当时CPR时对患者随机建立人工气道的3种不同方法,将其分为3组,进行回顾性分析,A组68例,常规行气管导管插管;B组140例,盲插喉罩通气;C组110例,食管气管联合导管通气。结果B组建立人工通气需(26+11.3)s,显著短于A组和C组【分别为(146±14.7)s和(81±16.5),均P〈0.05】。A组建立人工通气所需时间显著长于C组(P〈0.05)。盲插喉罩通气时间最短,其次是食管气管联合导管插管术,气管插管术最慢。B组一次插管成功率为100%,显著高于A组(60.3%,P〈0.05),与C组的差异无显著性(98.2%,P〉0.05)。B组与C组之间差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。A、B、C组三组复苏成功率分别为26.5%,25.7%和27.3%,相互间的差异无无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。结论院外急救车上最好早期应用盲插喉罩或食管气管联合导管。Objective To compare the effects in cardiopulmonary resuscitation of 3 kinds of artificial airway: conventional tracheal intubation, blind insertion of laryngeal mask, and esophageal-tracheal combined tube in prehospital ambulance.Methods 328 cases undergoing CPR in the prehospital ambulance were Randomly divided into 3 groups: Group A (n=68) undergoing conventional tracheal intubation, Group B (n=140) undergoing blind insertion of laryngeal mask, and Group C (n= 110) undergoing insertion of esophageal-tracheal combined tube. The time needed to establish artificial airway, one-time success rate of insertion, and resuscitation success rate were compared among these 3 groups. Results The time needed to establish artificial airway of Group B was (26±11.3) s, significantly shorter than those of Groups A and C[(146±14.7)s and (81±16.5)s respectively, both P〈0.05].The time needed to establish artificial airway of Group A was significantly longer than that of Group C (P〈 0.06). The one-time success rate of insertion of Group B was 100%, significantly higher than that of Group A (60.3%, P〈0.05), but not significantly different from that of Group C (98.2%, P〉0.05). There were not significant differences in the resuscitation success rate among these 3 groups (26.5%, 25.7% and 27.3%). Conclusion blind insertion of laryngeal mask is the best choice for CPR in prehospital ambulance, followed by insertion of esophageal tracheal combitube.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222