宋代历史考证学的传承与衍变  

Inheritance and Development of Historical Literary Criticism in the Song Dynasty

作　　者：程蕾[1] 施建雄[2] 

机构地区：[1]西北大学历史学院,陕西西安710069 [2]陕西师范大学历史文化学院,陕西西安710062

出　　处：《陕西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2013年第2期166-170,共5页Journal of Shaanxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目(NCET-10-0558);国家社会科学基金项目(08BZS002)

摘　　要：两宋时期,考据工作为众多学者所重视。司马光撰《通鉴考异》,详考各书史事记载的差异、说明史料去取的理由。他如洪迈的《容斋随笔》、王应麟的《困学记闻》不仅在考证内容上进一步丰富,而且在形式上也趋于多样化,深度与广度有了很大程度的拓展。司马光等启于前,洪迈、王应麟等倡于后,加上时代提供了适宜的土壤,将宋代历史考证学大大地向前推进了一步,同时也为传统学术研究的继续发展开辟了一条新路。In the period of the North and South Song Dynasties,a good number of scholars paid attention to historical investigation.Sima Guang exhaustively investigated differences of historical events recorded in different works and explained the reasons of selection and deletion in writing An Investigation of Differences in General Chronicles.Other such examples included Casual Notes in Rongzhai by Hong Mai,and Notes of Bewildering Points by Wang Yinglin,which not only enriched the contents but diversified the forms and extended the depths and expanse of historical investigation.Owing to Sima Guang＇s initiation and Hong Mai and Wang Yinglin＇s advocating as well as the proper soil offered by the times,historical investigation gained as great advance in the Song Dynasties and opened a new path for further development of traditional academic studies.

关 键 词：宋代史学史 历史考证学 《通鉴考异》 《容斋随笔》 《困学纪闻》 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学] K061