不法原因给付问题的刑民实像——以日本法为中心  

Real Images of Payment for Illegal Reasons in Criminal Law and Civil Law——Taking Japanese Law as the Center

作　　者：王骏[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江大学宁波理工学院,浙江宁波315100

出　　处：《法学论坛》2013年第3期140-147,共8页Legal Forum

基　　金：教育部人文社科青年基金项目"法秩序的统一性与违法判断的相对性--以刑民实体关系为视角"(12YJC820101)的研究成果之一

摘　　要：日本民法关于不法原因给付者可能丧失返还请求权的规定,引发了刑法领域不法原因给付场合能否成立侵占罪、诈骗罪的学术争鸣。刑民立法旨趣存在差异,各有侧重。刑法解释论不可能完全依从于民法规范及其解释,需为独立判断。只要是"保管"意义上的不法给付,不管是否为民法中的"终局性"给付,均有成立侵占罪的余地。被害人所处民事关系的不法,不影响行骗人成立诈骗罪。The rule that people who pay for illegal reasons may lose claim for return in Japanese civil law causes a academic debate whether relevant acts could constitute crime of misappropriation and fraud under above circumstances. Criminal law and civil law has different legislative purport, which has its own emphasis. The explanation theory of criminal law isnt completely in compliance with standards in the civil law and its interpretations and should be judged independently. As long as it is payment for illegal rea- sons in the sense of ＂keeping＂ ,no matter ＂final sex＂ payment in civil law, crime of misappropriation has the room to be con- firmed. The lawlessness of civil relationship the victim lies in does not affect the defrauder＇ s constitution of crime of fraud.

关 键 词：不法原因给付 侵占 诈骗 所有权 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]