安全留置针与普通留置针在急性冠脉综合征中的应用情况比较  

The application of safe type vein detained and average type vein detained needle in acute coronary syndrome

作　　者：葛帮荣[1] 

机构地区：[1]济宁市第一人民医院,山东济宁272011

出　　处：《临床医药实践》2013年第5期385-387,共3页Proceeding of Clinical Medicine

摘　　要：目的:比较安全留置针和普通留置针在急性冠脉综合征输液治疗中的应用情况。方法:选择急性冠脉综合征患者2 000例,随机分为两组,每组1 000例,安全留置针组使用安全留置针建立静脉通道,普通留置针组使用普通留置针建立静脉通道,比较两组患者穿刺一次成功率、撤芯失败率、针刺伤发生率及价格接受情况。结果:安全留置针可增加穿刺一次成功率,减少撤芯失败率(P<0.05),减少针刺伤发生率,费用接受情况低于普通留置针(P<0.05)。结论:安全留置针在急性冠脉综合征的应用效果优于普通留置针。Abstract Objective：To compare the effect of invenous infusion of two type vein detained needles：the safe type vein detained needle and average type vein detained needle. Methods：Two thousands cases with acute coronary syn- drome were randomly divided into two groups ：the safe type vein detained needle （1 000 examples）,the average type vein detained needle（1 000 examples）,comparising the sussess rate of one puncture,the failed extracting the intertnal noodle,and the needle injuries and acceptance of price. Results ：We find that the sussess rate of one puncture and the failed extracting the intertnal noodle of the safe type vein detained needle are higher than the average groups（P^0. 05） ,the injury rate and acceptance of price are lower（P^0.05）. Conclusion.The safe type vein detained needle is bet- ter than the average type vein detained needle in acute coronary syndrome.

关 键 词：急性冠脉综合征 安全留置针 针刺伤 价格 

分 类 号：R472[医药卫生—护理学]