检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]合肥市精神病医院,安徽230022
出 处:《安徽卫生职业技术学院学报》2013年第2期105-106,72,共3页Journal of Anhui Health Vocational & Technical College
摘 要:目的:探讨童年创伤与应对方式及自动思维的关系。方法:采用方便抽样,对合肥市精神病医院57例抑郁症患者及来自于该院以及安徽医科大学的54例正常者进行调查,完成童年创伤问卷(CTQ)、简易应对方式问卷(SCSQ)、自动思维问卷(ATQ)。结果:童年创伤与应对方式及自动思维之间两两显著相关(P<0.05);抑郁症患者组的童年创伤经历消极应对方式,负性自动思维显著高于正常组;中介效应检验分析发现,童年创伤可以通过负性自动思维间接影响消极的应对方式。结论:负性自动思维在童年创伤与消极的应对方式之间起着中介作用。Objective:To explore the relationship among childhood trauma, copying style and automatic thought. Methods:We assessed the dream threat level in 57 patients with depression and 54 healthy controls with the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ), Simply Coping Style Questionnaire(SCSQ)and Automatic Thought Questionnaire (ATQ). Results.Correlation analysis showed that childhood trauma, copying style and automatic thought were significantly corre- lated(P〈0.05); Compared with the healthy controls, depression patients had significantly higher the childhood trauma ,the automatic thought and the negative copying style (P〈0.01);regression analysis indicated automatic thought predicted the negative copying style directly. Conclusions:The childhood trauma and automatic thought could affect the negative copying style,and the automatic thought mediate relationship between the childhood trauma and the negative copying style.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.118