机构地区:[1]江苏省常州市第一人民医院苏州大学第三附属医院风湿免疫科,213003 [2]苏州大学医学生物技术研究所
出 处:《中华风湿病学杂志》2013年第5期318-322,共5页Chinese Journal of Rheumatology
基 金:江苏省常州市卫生局重大科技项目(ZD201108)
摘 要:目的探讨原发性干燥综合征(pSS)患者外周血单个核细胞(PBMCs)上程序性死亡分子(PD)-1和程序性死亡配体(PDL)-1的表达及生物学意义。方法应用流式细胞仪(FCM)检测62例Dss患者及15名健康对照者的PBMCs上CD4+PD.1+、CD8+PD.1+、CDl4+PDL.1+及CDl9+PDL-1+的表达率,详细记录各患者的临床资料及实验室结果,并分析PD-1/PD—L1协同抑制分子与pss患者的临床特点及疾病活动的相关性。统计学处理采用t检验,组间相关性分析采用直线相关分析。结果laSS患者外周血CD4+PD-1+表达(29±8)%显著高于健康对照组(23±4)%,活动期(34±8)%显著高于缓解期(27±6)%(P均〈O.01),但治疗前后差异无统计学意义;CD8+PD.1+表达(21±7)%显著高于健康对照组(17±6)%(P均〈0.05),活动期与缓解期、治疗前后差异均无统计学意义;pSS患者CDl4+PDL-1+表达(17±10)%显著低于健康对照组(24±12)%(P均〈0.05),活动期与缓解期、治疗前后差异无统计学意义;pSS患者CDl9+PDL-1+与健康对照组、活动期与缓解期、治疗前后差异均无统计学意义。CD4*PD-1+与CDl4+PDL-1+之间呈负相关。pSS患者CD4+PD-1+表达率与抗双链(ds)DNA、类风湿因子(RF)及红细胞沉降率(ESR)呈正相关,CD8+PD-1+表达率与免疫球蛋白(Ig)G、血小板呈正相关,CDl4+PDL-1+与抗dsDNA抗体、RF及补体(C)4呈负相关,CD19+PDL-1+与C4呈负相关。pSS患者肾脏损伤组外周血CD8+PD-1+的表达率显著高于无损伤组,有关节炎表现组外周血CDl4+PDL-1+的表达率显著低于无表现组。结论Dss患者外周血PD-1/PDL-1共刺激分子存在异常,与病情活动相关,可能参与到psS疾病中肾脏损伤及关节损伤,在pss的发病机制中起到重要作用,为pSS的治疗提供新的治疗靶点。Objective To investigate the expression and clinical significance of programmed death (PD)-I/ programmed death ligands (PDL)-I in patients with primary Sjsgren's syndrome (pSS). Methods The method of flow cytometry was used to measure the expression of CD4+PD-1+, CD8+PD-1+, CD14+PDL-1+ and CD19*PDL-1+ in 62 patients with pSS and the test results were compared with those of 15 normal controls. The linear correlation analysis was adopted to evaluate the relationship between the expression of CD4+PD-1+, CD8+PD-1 +, CD14+PDL-1 +, CD19+PDL-1 + and clinical manifestations. Comparisons between groups were performed by t test. Results The expression of CD4+PD-1+ was significantly higher in pSS patients (29±8)% than in normal controls (23±4)% (P〈0.01), and significantly higher in active pSS patients (34±8)% than inactive patients (27±6)% (P〈0.01), and there was no significant difference between untreated pSS patients (31±7)% and treated patients (31±8)%. The expression of CD8+PD-1+ was significantly higher in pSS patients (21±7)% than in normal controls (17±6)% (P〈0.05), and there was no significant difference between active pSS patients (20±9)% and inactive patients (22±6)%, as well as between untreated pSS patients (26±9)% and treated patients (19±4)%. The expression of CD14+PDL-1* was significantly lower in pSS patients (17±10)% than in normal controls (24±12)% (P〈0.05), and there was no significant difference between active pSS patients (16±9)% and inactive patients (17±10)%, as well as between untreated pSS patients(17±9)% and treated patients (16±15)%. There was no significant difference between pSS patients (16±6)% and normal controls (16±7)%, so was the difference between active pSS patients (16±3)% and inactive patients (16±7)%, and between untreated pSS patients (16±6)% and treated patients (18±8)% in the expressi
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...