交通标识的法律性质及其救济  

The Relief and the Legal Character of Traffic Signs

作　　者：敖双红[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南大学法学院,湖南长沙410083

出　　处：《法学杂志》2013年第5期69-76,共8页Law Science Magazine

基　　金：国家社科基金课题"预防腐败与<行政程序法>立法研究"(11BFX10)的阶段成果

摘　　要：交通标识主要有指示性、警告性和禁令性标识三类。指示性标识与警告性标识对人的效果一般属于行政事实行为,但指示性标识与警告性标识致人损害的救济则视起诉人的权利义务与该特定物关系的紧密程度而定,可能分别产生一般行政诉讼与行政公益诉讼。禁令性标识是对公物的使用规则的确定,属于一般性具体行政行为,当然能够实施行政救济,但设置合理与否以及法律效力产生的时间不同,救济后果也有区别。There are three traffic signs , such as indicative, warning and ban signs. Indicative and warning mark belongs to the administrative fact behavior, but the relief of their damage relate to the close degree between the rights and obligations of accuser and the specific objects, they may produce the general administrative litigation and administrative public interest litigation. Ban sign belongs to the concrete administrative behavior because the use rules of public property are determined, of course, the administrative remedy is implemented , but set reasonable or not and legal effect produced in different time, the relief consequences are different.

关 键 词：交通标识 一般命令 具体行政行为 国家赔偿 

分 类 号：D922.14[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]