中国古代獬豸神判的观念构造(下)  

The Concept Structure of Xie Zhi Divine Judgment of Ancient Chinese

作　　者：陈灵海[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学外国法与比较法研究院法律与历史研究所,上海200042

出　　处：《学术月刊》2013年第5期148-157,共10页Academic Monthly

基　　金：国家哲学社会科学重大项目"法律文明史""(11&ZD081)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：五、东汉獬豸神判观念的构造 不少学者常以《天子游猎赋》中的“解豸”、《淮南子·主术训》中的“獬冠”为据，认为中国先秦时期曾有神判存在。其实，这两种文献中的“解豸”、“獬冠”都与神判毫无关联。为了澄清这些误解，须先作一些说明。Many people think that the Xie Zhi（獬豸）unicorns divine judgment existed in pre-Qin rimes or even earlier in China. This article will point out that the case of Wang Liguo vs. Zhong Lixi, which always be used to prove the existence of divine judgment, was actually a align-swear event but be double misread. Although people in pre-Qin times had belief in deities but their legal casuistic way was secular. It was Western Han people who coined a strange new-name for rhinoceros. Xie Zhi is actually the pronunciation and meaning shift change of Xi Si（犀兜）. Divine idea formed in the Eastern Han Dynasty, was not associated with the divine judgment system of some minority nationalities in Ming and Qing Dynasties. After the middle of Western Han, the exotic species introduction and the theory of interaction between heaven and mankind provided an ideological foundation for the divine judgment concept. Rules of law supply imbalance caused in Qin and Han Dynasties provided a realistic basis for divine judgment system.

关 键 词：神判 构造 中国 《天子游猎赋》 古代 先秦时期 淮南子 

分 类 号：D903[政治法律—法学理论]