从“知识”到“理解”:认识论的重构何以可能?——兼论当代西方认识论的困境及其出路  

From "Knowledge" To "Understanding":Why and How Is The Reconstruction of Epistemology Possible——Concurrently On The Dilemma of Contemporary Western Epistemology and Its Way Out

作　　者：姬志闯[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南大学哲学系&马克思主义哲学与当代中国研究所,河南开封475004

出　　处：《自然辩证法研究》2013年第5期8-13,共6页Studies in Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"纳尔逊.古德曼哲学与当代美国哲学的话语转换"(09CZX026);河南大学青年骨干教师项目

摘　　要：对"知识"目标及其话语模式的遗继性承诺,使得以批判和改造传统认识论为基本旨趣的当代认识论话语不得不继续面对"知识的确定性要求/证明的相对性实现"悖论,并因此陷入了对传统基础主义的批判和认识论重构路径选择上的双重困境。而N.古德曼和C.Z埃尔金的"理解"认识论转向,则通过对"知识"目标的"理解"重置实现了对传统认识论理论自身及其言说方式的双重超越,进而为认识论的当代重构提供了一条可行路径。Because of the successive promise to the ＂knowledge aim＇and utterance pattern of the traditional epistemology,cotemporary western episte- mology which aims to criticize and reform it has to face the paradox of ＂knowledge＇s certainty requirement and the relative realization of its justifica- tion＂ ,and thus falls into the double dilemmas in criticizing and the path choice of reconstructing. However, the ＂undcrstanding＂turn of epistemology started by Nelson Goodman and C.Z.Elgin surpassed the traditional epistemology in the two aspects of theory and it＇s utterance pattern through re- placing ＂knowledge aim＂ by ＂understanding＂, and provide a feasible path for the reconstruction of contemporary western epistemology.

关 键 词：当代西方认识论 困境 “理解”转向 古德曼、埃尔金 重构 

分 类 号：B01-07[哲学宗教—哲学理论]