无意义与治疗:《逻辑哲学论》的果决式诠释解析  

Nonsense and Therapy:Analyzing the Resolute Reading of Tractatus

作　　者：赵瑞林[1] 

机构地区：[1]山西大学马克思主义哲学研究所,太原030006

出　　处：《自然辩证法研究》2013年第5期14-18,共5页Studies in Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目"言说的困境:<逻辑哲学论>中的"无意义"问题研究"(项目编号11YJC720061);山西大学校人文社会科学研究项目(项目编号1009009)

摘　　要：《逻辑哲学论》的果决式诠释是以戴蒙德与科南特等人为代表,对《逻辑哲学论》所做出的一种有别于以往的全新诠释,其基本主张是《逻辑哲学论》中句子的无意义是一种纯粹的无意义,因而维特根斯坦在此书中没有传达任何真理,而是意在消除人们所囿于的哲学幻象,达到哲学治疗的目的。本文意欲通过梳理此种诠释,展现其诠释《逻辑哲学论》的新视角,揭示其所面临的困境,为探寻《逻辑哲学论》的真实意蕴爬罗剔抉。The Resolute Reading is an interpretation different from traditional interpretation of Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. C. Diamond and J. Conant, as the deputies of this interpretation, basically claim that the nonsense of sentences in Tractatus is plain nonsense, so Wittgenstein had not conveyed any truth in Tractatus. ttis aim was to clear up the philosophical illusion in which one had get trapped, give them a philosophical therapy. The paper is to display the new viewpoint of the Resolute Reading, reveal its dilemma and explore the real aim of Tractatus.

关 键 词：《逻辑哲学论》 果决式诠释 无意义 阐释 治疗 

分 类 号：N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]