检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]杭州市红十字会医院药剂科,杭州310016 [2]杭州市预防保健门诊部职业病科,杭州310014
出 处:《中国药房》2013年第20期1884-1886,共3页China Pharmacy
摘 要:目的:比较莫西沙星与左氧氟沙星治疗中、青年耐多药肺结核病(MDR-PTB)的临床疗效及安全性。方法:将杭州市红十字会医院2007年6月-2011年2月收治的76例MDR-PTB中、青年患者根据治疗方式不同分为治疗组(40例)与对照组(36例)。治疗组患者口服莫西沙星片0.4g/d,对照组患者口服左氧氟沙星片0.5g/d,两组同时辅以其他相同的抗结核药物治疗,疗程均为12个月。治疗后观察两组患者疗效、痰菌转阴率、不良反应发生情况。结果:治疗组患者总有效率(92.5%)、痰菌转阴率(87.5%)显著高于对照组(75.0%、66.7%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:与左氧氟沙星比较,莫西沙星联合常规抗结核方案治疗MDR-PTB疗效、痰菌转阴率较好,不良反应发生率较低。OBJECTIVE:To compare the clinical efficacy and saftey of moxifloxacin vs.levofloxacin in the treatment of multi-drug resistant pulmonary tuberculosis(MDR-PTB) with young and middle-aged patients.METHODS:The 76 young and middle-aged patients from Jun.2007 to Feb.2011 who received therapy on MDR-PTB in red cross hospital of Hangzhou as research subjects were divided into treatment group(40 cases) and control group(36 cases).Treatment group was given moxifloxacin(0.4 g/d,po)and control group was received levofloxacin(0.5 g/d,po).Both groups were treated with the same chemotherapy for 12 month.RESULTS:The effective rate(92.5%) and time of sputum negative conversion(87.5%) of treatment group was significantly higher than control group(75.0%,66.7%,P0.05).Adverse drug reaction rate between 2 groups were close,the difference was not significant(P0.05).CONCLUSIONS:Compared with levofloxacin,moxifloxacin combined with traditional method in the treatment of MDR-PTB has better clinical efficacy and sputum negative conversion,but lower adverse drug reaction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15