检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]淮北师范大学体育学院,安徽淮北235000 [2]南京师范大学体育科学学院,江苏南京210023 [3]青岛农业大学体育教学部,山东青岛266109
出 处:《中国体育科技》2013年第3期43-50,共8页China Sport Science and Technology
基 金:国家体育总局哲学社会科学项目(1658SS12051);安徽省哲学社会科学项目(AHSK11-12D288)
摘 要:运用文献资料研究、数理统计、RSR法对第30届奥运会女子篮球项目参赛球队的攻防技术进行统计分析。研究认为,美国、法国、澳大利亚等3队攻防RSR值分别为1、0.83与0.84,隶属于A级水平;土耳其队与捷克队攻防RSR值分别为0.71与0.75,隶属于B级水平;俄罗斯、中国、巴西、英国等队攻防RSR值介于0.59~0.40之间,隶属于C级水平;克罗地亚队攻防RSR值为0.29,隶属于D级水平;加拿大队和安哥拉队攻防RSR值分别为0.17与0.08,隶属于E级水平;奥运会参赛球队排名与各队攻防RSR值排序的相关系数r=0.895(P<0.01),两者呈显著相关;与奥运会8强球队相比,在进攻指标方面,中国女子篮球队除2分球命中率和助攻外其余7项进攻指标均落后于对手,进攻篮板球与8强队之间呈显著性差异(P<0.05),被侵犯次数与8强队呈非常显著性差异(P<0.01)。在防守方面,中国队除犯规指标外,其余4项防守指标均落后于对手,盖帽次数与8强队呈非常显著性差异(P<0.01);与奥运会4强球队相比,在进攻指标方面,中国队除助攻指标外,其余8项进攻指标均落后于对手,进攻篮板球次数与4强球队呈显著性差异(P<0.05),被侵犯次数与4强球队呈非常显著性差异(P<0.01)。在防守指标方面,中国队除犯规指标外,其余4项防守指标均落后于4强球队,盖帽次数与4强球队呈非常显著性差异(P<0.01)。最后,提出提高中国女子篮球队攻防技术水平的建议。By using the method of Rank-sum ratio, this paper makes quantitative evaluation a- bout technical Index of women's basketball teams in the 30th Olympic Games. The results show that RSR value of technical index of the United States, France and Australia is 1,0.83 and 0.84, respectively. They belong to Grade A;RSR value of Turkey and the Czech Republic is 0.71 and 0.75, respectively. They belong to Grade B;RSR value of China, Brazil, the United Kingdom is ranging from 0.40 to 0. 59, they belong to Grade C; RSR value of Croatia is 0. 29, it belongs to Grade D; RSR value of Canada and Angola is 0.17 and 0.08, respectively. They belong to Grade E;The Correlation coefficient between Olympics ranks and RSR value is 0. 895(P〈0. 01), it means they are both significantly associated; Compared with the top 8 teams of the Olympic Games, except two-point field goal percentage and assists, Chinese women' s basketball team lags behind other teams in other 7 offensive index, it has significant difference (P〈0. 05) in offensive rebound and it has significant difference (P〈0. 01) in manufacturing foul. Chinese women's basketball team lags behind other teams in other 4 offensive index except foul, it has significant difference (P 〈 0. 01) in blocked shots ; Compared with the top 4 teams of the Olympic Games, except assists, Chinese women's basketball team lags behind other teams in other 8 offensive index, it has significant difference (P〈0.05) in offensive rebound and it has significant difference (P〈0.01) in manufacturing foul. Chinese women's basketball team lags behind other teams in other 4 offensive index except foul, it has significant difference (P〈0.01) in blocked shots. Finally, this paper put forwards some suggestions for Chinese women's basketball team.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117