检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中山大学肿瘤防治中心
出 处:《全科护理》2013年第12期1057-1058,共2页Chinese General Practice Nursing
摘 要:[目的]探讨和爽(复方聚乙二醇电解质散)和传统灌肠方法在食管癌结肠代食管病人术前肠道准备的效果差异。[方法]将40例食管癌结肠代食管病人术前肠道准备随机分成两组,和爽组20例,传统灌肠法组20例。对比观察其肠道清洁度、不良反应与术后并发症率的相关性。[结果]口服和爽组肠道清洁满意度优于传统灌肠组(P<0.05),腹胀腹痛、肛门不适感不良反应和吻合口瘘的发生率在两组中有统计学意义(P<0.05)。[结论]和爽用于肠道准备清洁效果优于传统灌法且并发症少,简便有效,护理方便,病人易于接受。Objective: To probe into the effect difference between Heshuang (compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte bulk) and traditional enema method in preoperative bowel preparation for esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophageal replacement with colon. Methods:A total of 40 cases of esophageal cancer undergoing esophageal replacement with colon were divided into Heshuang group and traditional enema group,20 cases in each,to contrast and observe the correlation among intestinal cleanliness, adverse reactions, and incidence of postoperative complications. Results:There was statistical significant difference in incidences of markedly effective, effective, ineffective in the bowel cleansing satisfaction between both groups (P〈0. 05). There was statistical significant difference in incidences of abdominal pain, abdominal distension, anal discomfort adverse reactions and anastomotic fistula between both group(P〈 0.05). Conclusion:The cleaning effect of Heshuang used for intestinal prepare is better, and with fewer complications, and it is easy, effective and with convenient care, so patients accepted easily.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28