检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周昌发[1]
出 处:《西南石油大学学报(社会科学版)》2013年第3期63-69,共7页Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:云南大学人文社科项目"金融服务供给的经济法分析"(11YUNHSSO44)
摘 要:金融调控是当代国家干预经济的重要形式,为了有效保证金融调控的效果,保障金融调控法律制度的执行和适用,对金融调控主体设定相应的法律责任实属必要。当前,我国有关金融调控主体法律责任的安排还需进一步完善,在确定法律责任主体时,应区分金融调控决策主体和执行主体并分别明确责任;在认定金融调控违法行为时,主要以是否违反金融调控法定程序为标准;金融调控法律责任的形态主要有继续履行、行政责任、刑事责任;金融调控法律责任主要通过金融调控复议和诉讼两种途径予以实现。Financial regulation is an important form of economic intervention of modem states. In order to ensure the effectiveness of financial regulation and the implementation and application of the legal system of financial regula- tion, it is necessary to set the corresponding legal liability for financial regulation subject. However, the present ar- rangements of legal responsibility of financial regulation subject need to be further improved in China. When we de- termine the subject of legal responsibility, we should clearly distinguish the responsibility of decision- making subject and executive subject of financial regulation. When determining whether financial regulation violates the law, we should also set as the standard whether statutory procedures are violated. Legal liability of financial regulation is taken in the form of continuing fulfillment, administrative responsibility and criminal responsibility and is mainly realized by way of reconsideration and litigation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.223.106.232