中国能源效率的空间模式与差异化节能路径——基于DEA三阶段模型的分析  

SPATIAL PATTERNS OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND DIFFERENT ENERGY-SAVING PATH IN CHINA—BASED ON THREE-STAGE DEA MODEL

作　　者：沈能[1] 王群伟[2] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学商学院 [2]苏州大学企业创新和发展研究中心,苏州215021

出　　处：《系统科学与数学》2013年第4期457-467,共11页Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences

基　　金：国家自然科学基金(71003023)资助课题

摘　　要：为了剥离环境和误差因素对能源效率值测算的影响,运用三阶段DEA模型,将污染排放指数作为非合意性产出测度我国区域能源效率.研究表明:纯技术效率不高是制约我国大多数省份能源效率提升的主要因素,结合各地区能源效率与投入水平,可以将我国各地区划分为相对效率高投入、相对效率低投入、高效率高投入、高效率低投入、低效率高投入和低效率低投入等6种能源效率模式;同时运用面板门限模型检验了产业结构与能源效率的门槛效应,发现产业结构与能源效率之间呈现倒"U"型关系.因此,在改进能源效率过程中,必须考虑不同地区的经济发展阶段和产业特征,采取差异化的节能减排政策.In order to exclude the influence of environmental variables and random errors on the energy efficiency, this paper uses the three-stage DEA model to calculate the energy efficiency in China. The results indicate that energy efficiency in China has been constrained by pure technical efficiency. Considering the energy efficiency and input, we divide 30 provinces in China into six energy efficiency models： relative efficiency and high input, relative efficiency and low input, high efficiency and high input, high efficiency and low input, low efficiency and high input as well as low efficiency and low input. Then nonlinear threshold panel model is used to analyze ＂threshold effect＂ between the industrial structure and energy efficiency. The result indicates that there exists an inverted U-type relationship between the industrial structure and energy efficiency. Therefore, different energy-saving policies should be taken to consider the different stages of economic development and industrial characteristics.

关 键 词：能源效率 DEA三阶段模型 非合意产出 

分 类 号：TK018[动力工程及工程热物理]