检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广州中山大学生物系,广东广州510275 [2]广州赛马娱乐总公司草坪部,广东广州510627
出 处:《草业科学》2000年第4期57-60,共4页Pratacultural Science
摘 要:试验将 3种混播组合对高等级公路边坡的防护效益进行了初步研究。结果表明 :混播组合方案 1(红豆草 6 0 % +无芒雀麦 2 0 % +多年生黑麦草 2 0 % )的防护效果最好 ,减少径流82 .6 % ,减少冲刷 90 .1% ;其次是混播组合方案 3(多年生黑麦草 4 0 % +草地早熟禾 2 0 % +匍匐翦股颖 2 0 % +紫羊茅 2 0 % ) ,减少径流 80 .9% ,减少冲刷 80 .9% ;而以混播组合方案 2(小冠花 70 % +多年生黑麦草 30 % )的防护效果最差 ,减少径流 76 .4 % ,减少冲刷 73.5%Three seed mixtures by weight included (1) 60% common sainfoin, 20% awnless brome and 20% perennial ryegrass; (2)70% boxleaf coronilla and 30% perennial ryegrass; (3) 40% perennial ryegrass, 20% kentucky bluegrass, 20% stolonbearing bentgrass and 20% red fescuegrass were evaluated for utility turf establishment grown along highway roadsides. The results indicated that the first mixture was the best one for preventing soil erosion. Compared with bare area the surface runoff and erosion reduced by 82.6% and 90.1% for the first mixture, 76.4% and 73.5% for the second one, 80.9% and 80.9% for the third one.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13