检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈夏冰[1] 杨丽娴[1] 张秀凤[1] 卢晓丽[1] 胡辉[1] 蔡柔妹 李怀瑜
出 处:《齐鲁护理杂志》2013年第9期9-11,共3页Journal of Qilu Nursing
基 金:2012年度汕头市医疗重点科技计划项目(汕府科[2012]113号-4)
摘 要:目的:探讨护理风险管理在出血性休克患者急诊抢救中的应用。方法:将2005年1月~2006年12月收治的72例出血性休克患者作为对照组,未实施护理风险管理措施;将2011年1月~2012年12月收治的76例出血性休克患者作为研究组,实施护理风险管理。观察两组患者休克程度、从抢救开始到休克纠正时间、临床疗效及满意度,同时评价家属与护士对抢救过程的满意度。结果:研究组从抢救开始到休克纠正时间短于对照组(P<0.01),研究组临床疗效和患者及家属满意度与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:在出血性休克患者急诊抢救中实施护理风险管理,可提高临床抢救效果和患者满意度。Objective : To explore the application of nursing risk management in the first aid of patients with hemorrhagic shock in emergency department. Methods :72 hemorrhagic shock patients treated from January 2005 to December 2006 were taken as the control group and nursing risk management measures was not implemented in this group;other 76 hemorrhagic shock patients treated from January 2011 to December 2012 were taken as the study group and nursing risk management was implemented in this group. The degree of shock, the length of time from rescue to correction of shock, clinical efficacy and satisfaction were observed in the two groups, and at the same time the family members' and nurses' satisfaction with the rescue process was evaluated. Results:The length of time from rescue to correction of shock was shorter in the study group than the control group ( P 〈 0.01 ) ; the differences in the comparison of clinical efficacy, patients' and family members' satisfaction were statistically significant between the two groups ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion : Application of nursing risk management in the first aid of patients with hemorrhagic shock can improve the clinical rescue efficacy and patient's satisfaction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.81.212