检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《浙江中医药大学学报》2013年第4期460-461,共2页Journal of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University
基 金:浙江省中医药科技计划项目(编号2009WA016)~~
摘 要:[目的]观察冬病夏治穴位贴敷配合点刺四缝穴法对反复呼吸道感染儿的防治作用。[方法]选取反复呼吸道感染儿60例,采用单盲方法随机分为2组,治疗组30例,对照组30例。治疗组予穴位贴敷配合点刺四缝穴,对照组直接穴位贴敷,治疗3个月后采用临床疗效评定标准评定患者的临床疗效。[结果]疗组治愈12例,显效10例,好转4例,总有效率为86.7%;对照组治愈2例,显效9例,好转10例,总有效率为70.0%。经Ridit分析,P<0.05,两组数据有显著性差异。[结论]冬病夏治穴位贴敷及点刺四缝穴法治疗儿童反复呼吸道感染优于直接穴位贴敷。[Objective] To observe the prevention and treatment of recurrent children respiratory tract infection by acupoints application and acupuncture for winter disease cured in summer. [Method] Select such cases 60, take single-bhnd method to divide them into 2 groups, 30 cases in each. The treatment group take acupoints apphcation and pricking method; control one, only acupoints application; after 3m, take chnical cure effect standard to evaluate the effects. [Result] In treatment group, 12 cases were cured, 10 had marked effect, 4 were better, the total effective rate was 86.7%; for control one, they were respectively 2, 9, 10 and 70.0%. With 1Lidit analysis, P〈0.05, there's marked difference between both groups. [Conclusion] The said method of combining acupoints apphcation and pricking is better than direct acupoints apphcation in treating children recurrent respiratory tract infection.
分 类 号:R245.9[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.223.162.245