检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邓少东[1] 王莲婧[1] 林励[1] 肖凤霞[1] 帅欧[1]
机构地区:[1]广州中医药大学中药学院,广东广州510006
出 处:《中草药》2013年第9期1195-1198,共4页Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs
基 金:国家科技部"十二五"科技支撑计划项目(2011BAI01B02);广东省科技计划项目(2012A030100005)
摘 要:目的比较超高效液相色谱(UPLC)法与HPLC法分析化橘红总黄酮指纹图谱的效果。方法分别采用UPLC法与HPLC法对17批化橘红药材的黄酮类成分进行指纹图谱分析。结果分别建立了化橘红黄酮类成分的UPLC与HPLC指纹图谱共有模式。其中UPLC法标识出21个共有峰,HPLC法标识出17个共有峰,17批样品的相似度均大于0.9。结论 2种方法均可用于化橘红的质量控制,UPLC法较HPLC法更高效、快速、灵敏。Objective To compare the UPLC and HPLC fingerprints of flavonoids in Citri Grandis Exocarpium (CGE). Methods The HPLC and UPLC methods for analyzing the fingerprint of 17 samples were established respectively. Results There were 21 mutual peaks selected from UPLC chromatography and 17 mutual peaks selected from HPLC chromatography. The similarity of 17 samples was over 0.9. Conclusion Both the UPLC and HPLC methods could be used for the quality control of CGE. Compared to HPLC, the UPLC method is efficient, quickly, and sensitive.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.36