微量泵持续气道加温湿化对气管切开后患者的护理体会  

The nursing experience of continuous warming airway humidification by micropump for patients after undergoing tracheotomy

作　　者：石晶明 王小松 

机构地区：[1]辽宁省鞍山市鞍钢总医院ICU,辽宁鞍山114000

出　　处：《中国当代医药》2013年第14期144-145,147,共3页China Modern Medicine

摘　　要：目的比较微量泵持续加温湿化与传统气道湿化对气管切开患者的影响。方法将118例气管切开患者随机分为观察组和对照组,观察组采用微量泵联合输液恒温器加热持续气道湿化法,对照组则采用传统常温间断气道湿化法。比较两组患者痰液黏稠度、并发症发生率。结果观察组刺激性咳嗽等并发症发生率较对照组明显减少,痰液黏稠度明显较低,痰痂形成较对照组明显减少,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论微量泵持续气道加温湿化法明显优于传统气道湿化法,气道湿化效果好,并发症发生率低。Objective To compare the effect of continuous warming airway humidifica-tion by micropump and the tra- ditional airway humidification on the patients after undergoing tracheotomy. Methods A total of 118 patients after undergoing tracheotomy were divided into observation group and control group randomly. The patients of observation group received continuous airway humidification by micropump and infusion thermostat, while the patients of control group were given traditional discontinuous airway humidification in normal temperature. Then both the sputum density of patients and their incidence of complications between the two groups were compared. Results Compared with the control group, the incidence of complications （irritable cough）, blocking with sputum and the sputum viscidity were significantly reduced in the observation group, the difference were statistically significant （P 〈 0.05）. Conclusion Contin- uous warming airway humidification by micropump is much better than the traditional airway humidification, It could reach good humidification effect of airway and with lower complications.

关 键 词：气管切开术 微量泵 气道湿化 护理 

分 类 号：R47[医药卫生—护理学]