检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢牧牧[1] 任浩洋[1] 陈孟莉[1] 张淼[1] 郭晓辉[1] 王茹[1]
机构地区:[1]中国人民解放军总医院药品保障中心,北京100853
出 处:《中国药业》2013年第8期71-72,共2页China Pharmaceuticals
基 金:全军医学科学技术研究"十二五"计划保健专项课题;项目编号:11BJZ01
摘 要:目的调查在技术措施基础上,联用行政措施干预静脉药物调配中心(PIVAS)不合理医嘱的效果。方法将2012年8月至11月医院老年病区药房静脉药物调配中心61 962条医嘱分为对照组和试验组,分别采用技术措施和技术行政综合措施对不合理医嘱进行干预,并统计分析。结果采用技术行政综合措施干预后,试验组不合理医嘱比例为1.27%,比对照组下降1.28%;不合理医嘱干预成功率为16.43%,比对照组提高6.65%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论综合干预措施,对于提高不合理医嘱干预的成功率具有一定的促进作用。Objective To investigate the effect of jointly using the administrative methods on the base of the technical method for intervening the irrational orders in the pharmacy intravenous admixture service(PIVAS).Methods Sixty-one thousand nine hundred and sixty-two orders collected in PIVAS in the senile disease area from August to November 2012 were divided into the control group and the experimental group,and performed the intervention on the irrational orders by adopting the technical measures and the comprehensive technical and administrative measures.The statistical analysis was conducted.Results After the technical and administrative interventional measures,the rate of irrational orders was 1.27%in the experimental group and decreased by 1.28%compared with the control group.The intervention successful rate was 16.43%in the experimental group,which was increased by 6.65%compared with the control group,the difference between them showing statistical significance.Conclusion The comprehensive interventional measures have some promoting effect in increasing the intervention success rate of the irrational orders in PIVAS.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62