检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京信息工程大学语言文化学院,江苏南京210044
出 处:《江西科技师范学院学报》2013年第2期17-20,共4页Journal of Nanchang Vocational & Technical Techers' College
基 金:南京信息工程大学第八期教改工程(N188501092)资助
摘 要:三十年来,随着语言学理论的不断发展,同义句式的研究也不断深化。肇始于上世纪八十年代的变换分析法为同义句式研究提供了理论和方法的指导,这一时期的同义句式研究着重于对同义句式的界定和分类。九十年代以后对同义句式的研究有了更加明确的思路,并出现对同义句式的类别进行概括的研究成果。进入新千年以来,语言学理论有了长足发展,形式语言学、系统功能语言学、认知语言学的理论原则和方法相继运用于现代汉语语法研究,对同义句式的解析也往往是几种语言学理论原则和方法的综合运用。应该看到,目前同义句式的研究还限于特定句式两两之间的比较研究,缺少成系统的大类比较研究;此外,研究的手段可以更加的多样,并借助语料库等扩大研究的取材。with the continuous development of linguistic theories for 30 years, the research on synonymous sentence patterns has continued to deepen. Transform analysis method provided the guidance of the theory and method for the study of the synonymous sentence patterns in 1980s. The period of the research focused on the definition and classification of the synonymous sentence patterns. After 1990s, the study had more clear thought and the research achievements of synonymous sentence category summarized. Since the new century, the linguistic theories have made remarkable development. Formal linguistics, systemic functional linguistics, cognitive linguistics theories, principles and methods have been applied to the modern Chinese grammar study. The interpretation of synonymous sentence patterns tends to be the integrated use of language learning in several theoretical principles and methods. It should be noted that the synonymous research is limited to particular sentence patterns. It lacks of systematic comparative study. In addition, the methods can be more diverse and make use of corpus, etc. to expand the research materials.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.254