心理学派、文化学派,还是综合学派?——孙本文社会学取向刍议  

Psychologicalism,Culturalism,or Syntheticalism? ——On the Sociological Theory Orientation of Sun Benwen

作　　者：谢立中[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学社会学系,北京100871

出　　处：《黑龙江社会科学》2013年第2期103-110,4,共8页Social Sciences in Heilongjiang

摘　　要：当我们问道"孙本文到底是一个心理学派的社会学家,还是一个文化学派的社会学家,拟或是一个综合学派的社会学家"时,实际上是预设了一个学术思想前后一贯、恒定不变的孙本文。而事实上,正如大家都明白的那样,仔细浏览一下孙本文的著作,我们就会看到,他的思想前后是有变化的。孙本文最早的思想的确是属于心理社会学派,而20世纪40年代的思想也的确是属于综合论社会学派。因此,笼统地问孙本文是一个心理学派社会学家、文化学派社会学家,还是一个综合学派社会学家;或者笼统地回答孙本文是一个心理学派社会学家、文化学派社会学家,还是一个综合学派社会学家,应该都是不合适的。It actually presupposes an coherent and constant academic Profile of Sun Benwen when we asked a question like ＂Sun Benwen in the end is a psychologicalism sociologist, a culturalism sociologist, or a Syntheticalism sociologist＂. In fact, taking a closer look at Suns works, we will see that the Sociological theory orientation of Sun Benwen has some changes in his academic life. His Sociological theory orientation indeed belong to the psyehologicalism in the early of his academic life, and indeed belong to the Synthetiealism in the late of his academic life. Therefore, a general question like that mentioned above, or a general answer to that ques- tion, should be inappropriate.

关 键 词：孙本文 心理学派社会学 文化学派社会学 综合学派社会学 

分 类 号：C4[社会学]