检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘志[1] 郝晓宁[2] 张振忠[1] 吴敬[3] 徐敏[3] 刘建春[1] 高雅[2] 徐龙彪[1] 塔娜[2]
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨医科大学卫生管理学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150086 [2]卫生部卫生发展研究中心,北京100191 [3]卫生部卫生应急办公室,北京100044
出 处:《中国医院管理》2013年第5期24-27,共4页Chinese Hospital Management
基 金:卫生部公益性行业科研专项基金(201002028);卫生部委托项目(卫应急预警便函〔2011〕54号)
摘 要:目的了解我国省级卫生应急人员对突发公共卫生事件风险评估的认知状况。方法采用问卷调查的方法,对全国31个省(自治区、直辖市)承担突发公共卫生事件应急处置的省级卫生应急工作人员进行调查,共计调查415名。结果应急人员普遍意识到突发公共卫生事件信息监测的重要性,但对监测信息来源认知较局限;对风险评估概念熟悉程度较低,且不同机构之间的认知存在一定差异;对风险评估工作的认知也存在分歧,认知水平亟待进一步提高。结论应完善信息获取途径、加强风险评估的宣传与培训、建立健全风险评估制度。Objective To understand the cognitive status of public health emergency risk assessment among provincial emergency staffs. Methods Questionnaire is designed and used to do the investigation among provincial emergency staffs in 31 provinces (municipalities and autonomous regions) in China. The sample number is 415. Results The results showed: most of the emergency staff has realized the importance of information monitoring, but the cognition of the monitoring sources is limited; the staffs are not so familiar with the risk assessment conception and the cognition difference among different agencies is statistically significant; there also exist differences on the cognition of the risk assessment contents and the cognitive level among provincial emergency staffs should be raised. Conclusion Three recommendations are given as follows: expanding the information sources of monitoring and perfecting the pathway of getting those; improving the cognitive level of provincial emergency personnel by enhancing the propaganda and training of risk assessment; establishing and perfecting the mechanism of risk assessment to direct and guide the routine risk assessment work.
分 类 号:R197.1[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222