守法主义与裁量正义  

Legalism and Discretionary Justice

作　　者：王国龙[1] 

机构地区：[1]西北政法大学刑事法学院,陕西西安710063

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2013年第3期3-14,共12页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：教育部社科基金项目(11YJC820114)

摘　　要：维护法律的权威和弥合"法律与社会现实之间的距离"是审判实践当中所面临着的永恒性难题,前者是技术性司法所努力的方向,后者则是自由裁量所努力的方向。在技术性司法背景下,为保障司法的客观性,法院和法官往往在追求司法技术理性、坚持司法克制主义以及反对司法决疑术的三个方面不断地努力。尽管这种努力并非是一种完全成功的努力,但守法主义却是一种久经磨砺的技术性司法立场,也是贯彻法治思维的基本司法原则。裁量正义需要通过其法律基础、社会基础和政治基础这三个宏观方面来加以建构。Upholding the authority of the law and bridging the gap between the law and the social reality are the eternal conundrum in the trial practice,while the former is an issue of the judicial technology,and the later an issue of discretion.In the background of judicial technology,in order to protect the objectivity of justice,the courts and the judges often take their efforts in three areas：the pursuit of the judicial technology,the persistence of judicial restrain and the opposition of judicial casuistry surgery.Although their efforts are not an entirely success,the legalism is a well-tempered technical judicial position and a basic principle of justice for implementing the rule of law.The discretionary justice needs to be constructed in the basis of its legal basis,social basis and political basis.

关 键 词：自由裁量 技术性司法 守法主义 裁量正义 

分 类 号：DF0-051[政治法律—法学理论]