检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丁皎[1] 孔丽华[1] 虞祥娟[1] 程洁[1] 罗莹[1] 费可[1] 毛智群[1]
机构地区:[1]中国.江苏省无锡市精神卫生中心精神科,214151
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2013年第5期731-732,共2页China Journal of Health Psychology
摘 要:目的探讨被动式音乐治疗辅助治疗抑郁症的疗效。方法将90例抑郁症患者随机分为研究组和对照组,研究组在对照组基础上辅以被动式音乐治疗。采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)和汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)分别观察疗效,连续观察8周。结果在治疗第1周,两组HAMD和HAMA评分均下降,但两组间有显著性差异(t=4.39,6.43;P<0.05)。第2周末开始两组间HAMD和HAMA评分差异无显著性。第8周末两组显效率分别为93.3%和86.7%,差异无统计学意义。结论被动式音乐治疗辅助治疗抑郁症起效快。Objective To explore the adjuvant effect of passive music therapy in treatment of patients with depression. Methods A total of 90 adult patients were recruited in the study. All the cases were diagnosed as patients with depression in accordance with the CCMD-- I diagnosis standard and randomized into two groups which were treated with for 8 weeks,Study group on the basis of the control group with passive music therapy. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD)and Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA)were used to observe the effectiveness. Results At the first treatment weekend,HAMD and HAMA scores were de- creased in both groups and there were significant differences between two groups(t= 4.39,6.43 P〈0.05). After the second week- end,there were no significant differences between two groups in HAMD and HAMA scores. At the eight weekend,the effective rate of two groups were 93.3% and 86.7% respectively,without statistical differences. Conclusion Passive music therapy has faster efficacy in adjuvant treatment of depression.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.188