《围城》接受的四个视阈——1979—2011年的《围城》接受研究  

Four Receptive Perspectives of Fortress Besieged:Its Receptive Study from 1979 to 2011

作　　者：陈思广[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川大学文学与新闻学院,四川成都610064

出　　处：《新疆大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2013年第1期100-105,共6页Journal of Xinjiang University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：2012年度教育部人文社会科学基金项目:"中国现代长篇小说的传播与接受研究"(12YJA751003);四川大学中央高校基本科研业务费研究专项资助(Skgt201105)

摘　　要：1979—2011年的《围城》接受在现实主义视阈、新批评视阈、存在主义视阈、比较文学视阈等四个视阈中显示出《围城》接受的学术进展。其中,现实主义视阈虽最先沿用却因接受者先验地以现实主义框架去套验现代主义的文本,从而使接受视阈与文本旨向发生了错位;新批评视阈一度因文本中心主义等形式主义方法,契合了转型时代的接受诉求;存在主义视阈因《围城》的存在主义质素为接受者寻求中国现代文学与世界同步文本提供了理想的标本;比较文学视阈是探析《围城》世界性因素的重要视阈,接受者以平行研究为重点,将重心放在展示钱钟书与《围城》同世界文学大师及其代表作的精神联结上。From the year 1979 to 2011, the reception of Fortress Besieged has made academic progress from four perspectives, namely, realistic; New critic; existential and comparative. The realistic perspective is the first to be adopted. However, the receiver has the priori to use the realistic method to frame a modern text, which causes the dislocation of the receptive vision and the direction of the text; new critic perspective manifests its vitality for its correspondence to the receptive appeal in the transition period for its formalist method centered on texts; existential perspective offers an ideal sample for the pursuit of Chinese literature＇s simultaneity with the world and times, thus realizing the historical spanning; comparative perspective is significant for the receiver＇s exploration in the worldwide elements. Emphasizing on the parallel study, receivers center on the manifestation of the author＇s spiritual connection with world masters in literature, which is the expectation and pursuit of receivers and the ultimate goal of the reception of comparative literature.

关 键 词：《围城》 现实主义视阈 新批评视阈 存在主义视阈 比较文学视阈 

分 类 号：I206[文学—中国文学]